[split] 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

[Pippy]

I'm surprised by the fact that while you claim to have good evidence against the official story you so far have not provided any

I want you to search it out,
I really hate posting links to other peoples work and calling it my proof on any debate here.

Scientists? how about Scholars?
http://www.st911.org/

Architects? This one you'd like I think.
http://www.ae911truth.org/

Pilots?
http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/

First response witnesses?
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

First read the Commission report, then start at the top with the more credible groups. I don't want to post a bunch of hooey, but these represent some of the better groups of truthers.

Compare the commission report to David Ray Griffen's The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, Debunking 9/11 Debunking or The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the cover-up, and the exposé.

It is also part of a much bigger picture, America and it's internal control mechanisms. This would not be the first time there was a terrorist attack on America that the official story left a lot of unanswered questions. You have to look into it in the context of its history.

why would they go through such pains to make the towers fall straight down?

Hey Meatball. They didn't want the towers to come straight down, but with Silverstien's controlled demolition it was the only choice. They just hoped that the average person wouldn't question it. "Hey, I've never seen a plane hit a building, so that must be what it looks like,".

Oh come on. Stop being facetious. You know full well that he meant that cockpit recorder had recorded the sounds the crew and passengers made as they tried to breach the cockpit door in their last bid effort to retake the plane.

But that is my point. The damage of the recorder proves nothing, especially about a struggle. But the flight recoders information itself, absolutely. So why wasn't it part of the public report of the incident? Either they did not recover the box, which I have tried to show is very unlikely, or they did and did not include it in the report. By saying there was a struggle, and some phone calls made 30,000 feet up from cell towers, but not supplying the evidence is itself facetious.

Or what did Cheney do that morning, as for the first time in it's history a vice president was given a militay command. His testimony was omitted.

You guys can believe Fox news, and Howard Stern, and all the rest. Go ahead. I will listen to the side of the story that does not have a conflict of interest.

I should have politely not gotten involved, but I would expect more questioning off the party line by you guys, as proposed freethinkers and atheists. Religion is a big control mechanism, but 9/11 was done by Bin Laden. He was never formally charged, or even found... But hey, you know, the government would never lie to us. Oh wait, Waco.

Sigh,
-Pip