(December 17, 2009 at 1:29 pm)Saerules Wrote:This proved harder than I though. For the sake of discussion, let's say "non-military attack" == "attack on civilians by anyone".(December 14, 2009 at 8:27 pm)Meatball Wrote:(December 14, 2009 at 8:13 pm)Saerules Wrote: Considering that one of the most populated cities in the USA was targeted... i find the death toll to be rather minor. 2,992 noted human deaths and a little over 6,000 noted humans injured? In a city of more than 18.8 million in the metropolitan area alone?Minor? Do you have an example of any other non-military attacks with death tolls like that?
Please define 'non-military'? Just what is 'military'?
Saerules Wrote:Are you being sarcastic?(December 16, 2009 at 10:34 am)Meatball Wrote: Why is the direction the towers fell even an issue? If this was a massive government (or any other kind) conspiracy, why would they go through such pains to make the towers fall straight down?
What purpose does that serve? To make amateur physicists paranoid?
To deal minimal damage to the population and other buildings as they tried to get the American people on their backs for a war in Afghanistan, Iraq, etc?
- Meatball
