Quote:But that is my point. The damage of the recorder proves nothing, especially about a struggle. But the flight recoders information itself, absolutely. So why wasn't it part of the public report of the incident? Either they did not recover the box, which I have tried to show is very unlikely, or they did and did not include it in the report. By saying there was a struggle, and some phone calls made 30,000 feet up from cell towers, but not supplying the evidence is itself facetious.The recording from the flight recorder was played to the families of the United 93 crew and passengers. I don't see why it needs to be played to anyone else. They testified that the passengers revolted, and the interviews they provided afterwards were the basis for making two films about the events. The report stated that various phone calls were made from the plane, confirming a hijacking, and confirming that a passenger revolt had taken place. This has all been made public, and it is your unwillingness to accept these transcripts and testimonies that is the only problem here.
We don't release data about crimes in courts to the media, and there is no reason to do the same here. If you were personally affected by 9/11 (i.e. lost a family member in it) then you have every right to obtain the data relating to that family member. However, to ask for data that has absolutely nothing to do with you, and violates the privacy of others, is not only illegal but unethical.
