RE: Pineapples disprove Big Bang
June 15, 2013 at 11:17 am
(This post was last modified: June 15, 2013 at 11:20 am by Pandas United.)
(June 15, 2013 at 3:01 am)cato123 Wrote: Yet another asshole, atheist or theist, that has no appreciation for a Planck length.
First of all, I'd appreciate it if you actually responded to my objections at hand instead of quoting someone else's words and putting my name above it. Second of all, why would I have any regard for Planck length? It is purely theoretical right now.
(June 15, 2013 at 2:54 am)Esquilax Wrote:(June 15, 2013 at 1:29 am)Pandas United Wrote: Why does it have to have a beginning? Because science and philosophy say it does-
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0110/0110012v2.pdf
http://www.logika.umk.pl/llp/1834/5-1834zw.pdf
And that beginning is necessarily the Christian god of the bible because...?
Never said it was the Christian God. Solely an argument for a general God-like being (immaterial, timeless, spaceless, extremely powerful, necessary, etc..). If we're solely going by the cosmological arguments from contingency, the creator of the universe could be some sort of deistic God for all I know.
All generalizations are false.
