(June 15, 2013 at 11:17 am)Pandas United Wrote:(June 15, 2013 at 3:01 am)cato123 Wrote: Yet another asshole, atheist or theist, that has no appreciation for a Planck length.
First of all, I'd appreciate it if you actually responded to my objections at hand instead of quoting someone else's words and putting my name above it. Second of all, why would I have any regard for Planck length? It is purely theoretical right now.
Simple mistake on my part. (Thanks to FNM for the technical correction).
The amusing part is that you and everyone knows that I was replying to your bullshit and not the previous post of Mister Agenda's.