Miracles and Anti-supernaturalism

[Silver]

James Moore says that "today scientists will admit that no one knows enough about 'natural law' to say that any event is necessarily a violation of it.

Therein lies the usual problem with theists. If it is not understood, it is automatically supernatural and thus God.

Goodness forbid theists actually attempt to understand something without automatically assuming it is too divine to be understood.

---

John Montgomery denotes that he anti-supernatural position is both "philosophically and scientifically irresponsible."

I believe science is hardly the place for man to prove the supernatural, considering that science deals with natural law. If, though I do not see it ever happening, science does happen to stumble across proof of a deity's existence through natural law, that would be an entirely different matter.

---

"But can the modern man accept a "miracle" such as the resurrection? The answer is a surprising one: The resurrection has to be accepted by us just because we are modern men.

That is not an explanation so much as it is an excuse. It does not have to be accepted whatsoever.