(June 18, 2013 at 2:42 pm)Ryantology Wrote:(June 13, 2013 at 10:22 pm)BettyG Wrote: You are using a much narrower definition of reality than I am. There is more than what meets the eye.
There is certainly more than meets the eye. What you have to demonstrate the existence of the specific 'more' you seem certain exists.
As a Christian, you imply that you have exclusive access to the truth. Appealing to the unknown only serves to undermine the claim you're attempting to defend.
The evidence is outlined in books I have read: The Godless Delusion, I Don't have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, The Language of God, Mere Christianity, and The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict. Save me the trouble of typing all that and read the books. I dare you.
A thing cannot be both true and not true at the same time. I have been showing the flaws in Hume's and Descartes' logic. I supposed I will get around to Immanual Kant and the rest sooner or later, but I would prefer not to have to go there. It is all easily available in the books I listed above.
I have to call it a night for now.
