Russia embraces religious intolerance with draconian blasphemy and anti-gay laws

[Statler Waldorf]

I do not know if there is an actual right or wrong. But certain actions, example - rape, have no justification across societies and borders. At least, none that I have seen yet, but there is much doubt in ever finding a halfway decent argument for rape.

Well I think a rapist would say they rape because they enjoy it, who determines whether that is enough justification or not?

And I am not saying anything is absolutely wrong. Is this action worth the damage? No? Don't do it. It's not even about right/wrong for me personally, so much as is there a good reason to do *insert action here*?

I am just not sure where these rules you keep appealing to come from, for instance where does the rule that a particular action must be worth the damage come from? What if someone doesn’t care whether it’s worth the damage or not?