(June 25, 2013 at 1:46 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Not in any particular order:
Kalam's Cosmological argument.
Teleological argument.
Ontological argument.
Transcendental argument for existence of god.
They are all fallacious. Yet, so many theists believe they are compelling.
Dumb, dumb, dumb...
I fucking hate this crap. Why do these arguments fail?
Well, simple, would these people who use these stupid arguments buy the same arguments if someone with a different pet deity were using them?
You still are stuck with the fact that there are countless claims of various god/s.
If logic worked like they want it to, then by observing lightening would make Thor real. The Egyptians at least had the sun to point to when claiming it was a god, modern gods of Abraham have less than that.
How about humans make up gods because of our own human ignorance?
