(July 1, 2013 at 12:34 am)Inigo Wrote: You can't refute an argument by calling it a turd ball.
And neither can you turn a turd ball into a reasonable argument.
(July 1, 2013 at 12:34 am)Inigo Wrote: You then accuse me of lacking originality. That's untrue and irrelevant. To my knowledge nobody has defended quite the view I am defending. For the view I am defending is not that morality is composed of the commands/favourings/instructions of the Judaeo Christian god, but that morality is the composed of the commands of a vengeful god who is not perfectly morally good. My arguments, if anything, only underscore the non-existence of the Christian god. But anyway, the originality of an argument has nothing to do with its soundness or validity. So I'm unsure why you mentioned it unless you're just a horrible person.
I'll grant you that at least one of us is a horrible person, insincere and guilty of misrepresentation. It just isn't me.
What is not original is to pass your self off as something other than the apologist missionary you are so that you can voice the concerns you feel we should all have as atheists. As usual you resent that we won't just accept your definition of atheism. Terribly inconvenient for you no doubt.
No one here wants or needs your snake oil.
