BrotherNeto Wrote:Semantics. I am not saying it exists in a literal sense. It can only exist because we exist, otherwise it would be pointless to talk about it. It doesn't exist in a literal sense. It exists as a concept. Concepts and reason follow our own sensations and observations. It is a follow up to our own reactions in the real world added into a sense of reason. You do know there is a nerve effect which causes your chest to swell when you see a group of people being helped. Just another interesting fact.
So you accept that morality does not exist. Fine. My point is that morality can exist, it just requires a god. It appears to exist (for we have the sense that there are external instructions that confer reasons for compliance). Most of us believe it to exist (for most of us believe some acts to be wrong and others right). But unless a certain sort of god exists, then morality doesn't.
There's no point in telling me about the existence and causal genesis of moral sensations and beliefs. I don't dispute their existence. Nobody does.
