(July 4, 2013 at 12:55 pm)Inigo Wrote:(July 4, 2013 at 3:43 am)genkaus Wrote: Prove it. Prove afterlife and that onlythe instructions of a supernatural agent could possibly confer the necessary reasons.
? First, what I am arguing is that there would need to be an afterlife for moral instructions to exist. That's a conditional. I'm not saying 'there is an afterlife'. I am saying 'there would need to be if these sensations are to have anything that vindicates them'. If I am correct about that then our moral sensations are sensations 'of' the instructions of an agent who has control over our interests in an afterlife. And therefore those sensations would be defeasible evidence of such a person and a place. Note 'defeasible'. It isn't proof anymore than your visual impression that there is a computer monitor in front of you is 'proof' of such a thing.
That takes a very dim view of humanity - and one that is encouraged by Religion so that all goodness can be allocated to God.
Morality is its own reward - there is no need for rewards in heaven. Its the feel good factor as much as anything else.
For example: the other day I was walking the dog and came across a wallet in the park. In the wallet was an a bank statement. The address was close by so I dropped it off on the way back. No reward required - I felt good all day.