Considering it's not intellectually responsible to ask someone to disprove something that has no clear definition and without making any attempts to prove it in the first place? Why is one allowed to ask, and the other not allowed to refuse an answer without being called intellectually irresponsible? Because when posed with a question like that everyone knows there's countless and countless of gods imaginary and yet to be imagined. If the person who asks doesn't put in the effort to ask a good question (yes there are such things as bad questions), even if everyone responds with something other than the burden of proof argument, still wouldn't get far.
The question posed in this thread was, what if a theist/deist asks us to prove there is no God. That isn't a good question for a theist to ask, and the motive is, excuse my cynicism, obviously not to get to the truth.
The question posed in this thread was, what if a theist/deist asks us to prove there is no God. That isn't a good question for a theist to ask, and the motive is, excuse my cynicism, obviously not to get to the truth.
