(July 9, 2013 at 10:19 pm)Inigo Wrote: Yes they have. Me. I have presented arguments that establish that morality requires a god. Unless you actually address those arguments and show something to be wrong with the premises (which involves more than just nay saying) then I have done exactly as you asked. Deny that morality instructs and provide supporting considertaions. Deny that moral norms have inescapable rational authority and provide supporting evidence. Unless you can do that you're just nay saying. You just dislike the conclusion and infer that the argument must be faulty because a conclusion you dislike can't possible be true (or so I suggest).
This is a long thread and I've come to it late. Can you point me to the posts you've made which explain your assertion that morality is instructive, and why (if this is true) that only a god can explain it?
