(December 30, 2009 at 10:09 pm)Synackaon Wrote: Being passionate about something is nothing to sneer at. Linking it to religion doesn't change it either - guilt by association doesn't work.
I was making a joke. A small one, but yes a joke.
(December 30, 2009 at 10:09 pm)Synackaon Wrote: I disagree with the plot being great, but aye, eye of the beholder.
It would be silly to argue opinion, I could care less if you liked it or not.
(December 30, 2009 at 10:09 pm)Synackaon Wrote: Certainly basing policies just because of a TV show is certainly nutty sounding to me. The lobotomy you lovingly ascribe is somewhat crazy sounding.
I'm starting to wonder if you know the difference between fiction and reality. I don't seriously want to them to get a labotmy. I have a feeling you didn't grasp the mostly facetious nature of this post.
(December 30, 2009 at 10:09 pm)Synackaon Wrote: You don't have the right to be not offended. And I dislike the movie.
When did I say I was offended? I reread my post and sure enough I did not say I was. I'm not going to get offended because people don't like a movie I liked, that's retarded. The point I was making is that people like and dislike movies TV shows for whatever reason, I honestly don't care. However, I just think people who take them too seriously and apply them to real life are being extremely silly.
As Meatball pointed out, military people are killed all the time in movies, why single this one out? There are plenty movies that have all sorts of objectionable messages.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :
odcast:: Boston Atheists Report
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :
