(July 15, 2013 at 2:34 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote:(July 15, 2013 at 11:39 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: They cannot breed, so their relationships do not contribute to the future of society at all, so why would anyone consider their "PDA" to be somewhat in the range of heterosexual "PDA"?
So you're saying unless kissing can result in children, it shouldn't be allowed in public? What about heterosexual couples who can't or don't want to have children? Should they also be banned from kissing in public?
The anti-gay crowd is so desperate to latch onto any reason why homosexual this or homosexual that shouldn't be allowed, that they always bring up the "they can't have children" nonsense. Now we're seeing it used to defend banning gays from kissing in public.
Indeed, some nominal heterosexuals like this "'kılıç_mehmet" here ought not be allowed to contaminate the gene pool with anything so forsaken by Allah as to be besmirched by his DNA.
