RE: Russia embraces religious intolerance with draconian blasphemy and anti-gay laws
July 15, 2013 at 5:55 pm
(July 15, 2013 at 5:21 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: According to you that must mean you lost the arguments since they didn’t approve of them.The problem was not that they didn't find my arguments convincing. The problem is they deleted my posts and banned me from posting again.
Leaving an argument stand for all to read and not even consider it worthy of reply is a sign you find the argument weak.
Censoring an argument and deleting it so others don't see it is a sign you find the argument too strong to challenge and censorship is your only recourse.
Very different things.
Quote:If it makes you feel any better, if I had my own Christian forum I’d allow you to post there, I think open debate does nothing but help the advancement of the faith.Evidently, your brothers and sisters in Christ that do run their own forums don't share that confidence for whatever reason.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
