RE: Blind faith and evolution
July 19, 2013 at 9:31 pm
(This post was last modified: July 19, 2013 at 9:32 pm by Chas.)
(July 19, 2013 at 5:32 pm)whateverist Wrote:(July 19, 2013 at 4:36 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: you don't know that it's true, just like creationists don't know that creation is true, do you see the hypocrisy?
Well the theory of evolution is on as good a footing as most any other scientific theory. No hypocrisy here. If you really think evolution has no more claim to being considered true than the theory of divine creation, why do you call yourself an atheist? Agnostic at most, not that there is anything wrong with that.
Evolution has evidence. Divine creation has none. That seems to me to be an important difference.
(July 19, 2013 at 6:43 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: well it was more along the lines of this question right here:
at what point did inorganic material turn into organic life forms and what caused it?
and i dnt claim to be an athiest, they are dogmatic, just another religion to me, both are the same and equally unbalanced.
i am anti-religious
I do not yet know my origin, and neither do you.
Again, this is not part of the theory of evolution.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
