RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
July 19, 2013 at 11:06 pm
(July 19, 2013 at 10:44 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote:(July 19, 2013 at 10:12 pm)KichigaiNeko Wrote: At what point did you become real?
that's funny i would ask an evolutionist the same question
my answer is i dont know. you?
(July 19, 2013 at 10:21 pm)Chas Wrote: I don't know when or how life on earth began, but there are some good hypotheses and there is evidential support for them. We're working on it.
I don't know whether or not any gods exist, but there is no evidence for any of them and mountains of evidence against most of them.
Those are the common opinions of many scientific people and many atheists.
thank you so much for your civility.
and i think that most atheists and scientific people are nice decent reasonable people. I also think that many religious people are nice decent reasonable people. but the underlying ideologies of a group are not always out in the open and my argument is that atheism is no different than christianity in that respect. people should be careful of what name they associate with any group that has a common belief of something unknown.
and in general, athiesm holds that "we do not believe in a god or gods" and ill repeat it, that is not the same as saying "I don't have any belief in the subject of whether or not a god or gods exist."
I do not believe that any gods exist because there is no evidence of any.
I don't know that no gods exist, but I lack any belief in them.
That's not the same as your statement. You have stated agnosticism.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.