Thanks again for the replies, very helpful,
Wiki's proposition link lead me to the premise of a statement.
The issue concerning the definition of both "god", and "exists", seems to be assigned to 'world differences'. Disparity between how a follower 'see's' "god" and the distinct differences in what is meant by exists, after that.
Here's something interesting which happens to the statement "god exists" when we take these two points into account (premise and world).
My idea was that by implication god already exists and so the assertion is already made and that god does exist albeit on disparate ideas. Now, the statement/assertion on the premise of exists should be missing (see premise), that's what would be logically correct if that statement were made amongst believer's! Apparently the statement has an intended audience.
Does this mean that it isn't actually a statement since it is fundamentally argumentative?!
I don't want to go too far with this, just want to tear the heart out of something which irritates my brain like an itch. It doesn't seem correct (lol), I mean beyond the ambiguous limitations.
Wiki's proposition link lead me to the premise of a statement.
The issue concerning the definition of both "god", and "exists", seems to be assigned to 'world differences'. Disparity between how a follower 'see's' "god" and the distinct differences in what is meant by exists, after that.
Here's something interesting which happens to the statement "god exists" when we take these two points into account (premise and world).
My idea was that by implication god already exists and so the assertion is already made and that god does exist albeit on disparate ideas. Now, the statement/assertion on the premise of exists should be missing (see premise), that's what would be logically correct if that statement were made amongst believer's! Apparently the statement has an intended audience.
Does this mean that it isn't actually a statement since it is fundamentally argumentative?!
I don't want to go too far with this, just want to tear the heart out of something which irritates my brain like an itch. It doesn't seem correct (lol), I mean beyond the ambiguous limitations.
Coming soon: Banner image-link to new anti-islam forum.
