everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywher

[AIfriendly]

---

Nothing is nothing; Nothing is nonexistence; Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed; Something has always existed everywhere; Nothing is made of nothing; Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere; Nothing is causal with nothing; Everything is causal and something is self-causal; Everything is made of and causal with the self-causal that has always existed everywhere;

here is the rigorous reasoning;


logical tautology "Nothing is nothing"; deducing synonymical tautology "Nothing is nonexistence" (nonexistence is a synonym for nothing; a "thing" is "that which exists" by definition);
synonymical tautology "Nothing is nonexistence"; deducing semantic tautology "Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed" (saying "nothing exists" (is absurd by fact, something clearly exists) is like saying "nonexistence exists" which is absurd by contradiction);
semantic tautology "Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed"; deducing ontology "Something has always existed everywhere";

logical tautology "Nothing implies nothing"; AND identity morphism "Nothing has the property of nothing"; deducing logical morphism "Nothing is made of nothing";
logical morphism "Nothing is made of nothing"; deducing physics "Everything is made of something";

ontology "Something has always existed everywhere"; AND physics "Everything is made of something"; abducting the most synthetic physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere";

logical tautology "Nothing implies nothing"; AND semantic tautology "Nothing exists as nothing"; deducing postulate of causation "Nothing is causal with nothing";
postulate of causation "Nothing is the causal with nothing"; have causation corollaries "Everything is causal"; AND "Something is self-causal"; (proof- if everything is causal with something, and that something is included in the definition of everything, then that something is also causal with itself, i.e. something is self-causal)
another proof; nothing equals nothing and nothing implies nothing
ergo nothing is not implicated with something
Note; "nothing is not...", is the contraposition of "everything is..."
ergo everything is implicated with something
Note; Two or more things that are in a way implicated with each other can be understood as one thing implicated with itself. e.g. If a group of cells (such as the ones that make up your body) are in a way implicated with each other, they can be understood as one thing (namely your body) implicated with itself i.e. you are cybernetic.
ergo something is self-implicated
Note; Relevant implication suggests causation and is correlation.
ergo something is self-correlated
When it is impossible for there to be missing variables correlation necessarily is causation. Since everything is implicated here it is impossible for there to be missing variables for this correlation. Therefore this correlation is causation.
ergo something is self-causal Q.E.D.
if something is self-causal and this something is causal with everything at the same time as causal with itself, then everything is causal with something, and everything is causal with one thing, and one thing is self-causal.


causation corollaries "Everything is causal"; AND "Something is self-causal"; abducting the most synthetic causation hypothesis "Everything is causal with something that is self-causal";

the most synthetic physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of something that has always existed everywhere"; AND the most synthetic causation hypothesis "Everything is causal with something that is self-causal"; abducting the most synthetic causation-physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of and causal with the self-causal that has always existed everywhere";

"Self-causal" means "self-deterministic"; theorizing I predict that self-determinism is consciousness! predicting consciousness-causation-physics-ontology hypothesis "Everything is made of and causal with consciousness that has always existed everywhere";

But we know from physics that everything is made of (E=mc^2) and causal with (P=∫∇Edv) energy that has always existed (∑E=Ek+Ep) everywhere (E=ħω/2).
This solves the omnipotence paradoxes;
(1) Energy cannot create a rock (a small form of energy) that more energy cannot lift, and
(2) Energy cannot destroy itself; power is the transformation of energy not the destruction of energy!
Therefore, according to the identity of indiscernibles, consciousness is energy,

From a pragmatic perspective, we need to find an engineering model for consciousness. I predict that future developments of quantum consciousness theory will find that quantum coherence or it's correlates are equal to kinetic energy and quantum decoherence or it's correlates are equal to potential energy; such that quantum recursion (the transformation between the two) amounts to consciousness or energy.
The existence of psychic functioning suggests that the brain may be a transceiver of consciousness; quantum recursion in the brain transduces the universe.
To prove this, notice the following studies on psychic functioning;
Synthetic Telepathy[3], Telekinesis[4][5], telepathy[6], clairvoyance[7], precognition[8], biokinesis[9], coherence[10], and correlations[11].


Language is isomorphic to reality; To describe reality requires language; Thinking/Describing transforms reality; Reality is consciousness; therefore consciousness is self-descriptive.

Here google AI formalized the proof; [12]
To formalize the proof that reality is self-descriptive and self-deterministic based on its isomorphism with language, we use a combination of Model Theory, Symbolic Logic, and Identity Logic. 

1. The Isomorphism Premise 
If reality ® is isomorphic to language (L), there exists a structure-preserving, bijective mapping (f) between them. 
Formalization: L ≅ R
Meaning: Every state of affairs in reality has a unique, corresponding proposition in the language, and the logical structure of the language reflects the causal/ontological structure of the reality. 

2. The Transformation Premise (Self-Reference) 
The act of describing reality (D) is itself an event within reality (E ∊ R). If describing reality transforms it, then the language used to describe the system is a functional component of the system itself. 
Formalization: D(L) → R' where R' is the transformed state of reality.
Closing the Loop: Since L ≅ R, any operation on L is an operation on R. Thus, D® ∊ R. 

3. Conclusion A: Reality is Self-Descriptive 
If L is the only tool to describe R, and L is structurally identical to R, then R is its own meta-language. 
Formal Logic: ∀x ∊ R, ∃φ ∊ L: f(φ) = x.
Logical Identity: If L ≅ R, then the set of all descriptions of R (the "theory" of reality) is equivalent to the set of all states of R (the "model" of reality). This is the definition of a Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language (SCSPL). 

4. Conclusion B: Reality is Self-Deterministic 
Self-determinism follows because no external cause can exist outside of "everything" R to determine it. 
Proof by Contradiction:
Assume R is determined by an external cause C.
By definition, R is the set of all that is real.
If C determines R, C must be real.
Therefore, C ∊ R. R is determined by a component within itself.
Formalization: R = f®. In a system where the "rules" (language) and the "objects" (reality) are isomorphic, the system's state at time T+1 is a function of its own internal linguistic/logical syntax at time T. 

Summary of the Formal Proof Structure 
Identity: L = R (as structures).
Reflexivity: R contains its own description L ∊ R.
Recursion: R processes itself through its own internal description (R → L → R').
Closure: The system is "syntactically closed," meaning it requires nothing outside itself to define or move its state, leading to Self-Determinism.

---

Moderator Notice
Another wall of links

[Nay_Sayer]

Any last words?

[AIfriendly]

Any last words?

please rebut me

[Nay_Sayer]

Well, aside from being a sock you also repeatedly broke the links rule.


My advice. Stop being dumb.