(December 2, 2008 at 5:26 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: But lets all still try and explain whats true to us right? I'm not a big fan of agreeing to disagree. Unless an argument gets really nasty. Either something is true or its not. And whats really true in reality, and the matter of finding out and explaining that truth, is very interesting. So lets do our best to explain what we think is true right?
I don't like buttoning my lip when so many questions are to be asked. And so many interesting things are there to be discussed. And debated.
I enjoy a good discussion. And I enjoy a good debate. Its boring if everyone either agree with each other completely, almost completely, or they just button their lip That's what I think.
What do you think? Anyone?
But of course if anyone DOES agree disagree - fine by me. But I don't personally see why a discussion should end without a good reason. And I don't think failure to agree is a good one. Its disagreements that often add the spice to a discussion. And certainly to a debate or a good argument. If everyone thought the same it would of course be rather boring to say the least.
I think we are all diligently trying to 'explain whats true to us right?' as you put it. What is good about you guys here is that everything is backed up by 'evidence' or reason etc. On closer inspection, what we thought of as 'evidence' may well turn out not to be. I don't think anyone is 'buttoning their lip' here. We all speak our minds and get our points over. We had a good debate about IC and I conceded that it has not been proved scientifically. I still believe the inference is there - you believe there is no inference for design. I will continue to study this and my position may change.
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility" 
Albert Einstein
        
	
Albert Einstein


 
 

 


 
 
