Hello everyone!!

[Edwardo Piet]

I think we are all diligently trying to 'explain whats true to us right?' as you put it. What is good about you guys here is that everything is backed up by 'evidence' or reason etc. On closer inspection, what we thought of as 'evidence' may well turn out not to be. I don't think anyone is 'buttoning their lip' here. We all speak our minds and get our points over. We had a good debate about IC and I conceded that it has not been proved scientifically. I still believe the inference is there - you believe there is no inference for design. I will continue to study this and my position may change.

That's fine by me. I was just referring to that you seemed to want to agree to disagree. When you said "we can always agree to disagree". You can. But I thought you wanted to and I was just giving my opinion on that. But at the same time saying that by all means if you want to then fine. But I just wanted to give my opinion that I like conversations to continue if there's more disagreements As long as it hasn't gotten nasty.
I was just saying that I don't like the whole "agree to disagree" thing unless its guests nasty. And if it gets nasty people often refuse to then anyway!