Hello everyone!!

[CoxRox]

That's fine by me. I was just referring to that you seemed to want to agree to disagree. When you said "we can always agree to disagree". You can. But I thought you wanted to and I was just giving my opinion on that. But at the same time saying that by all means if you want to then fine. But I just wanted to give my opinion that I like conversations to continue if there's more disagreements As long as it hasn't gotten nasty.
I was just saying that I don't like the whole "agree to disagree" thing unless its guests nasty. And if it gets nasty people often refuse to then anyway!
[/quote]

I get ya I think some things we discuss may end up with us saying this. Although this is not the best outcome, after all one is right and one is wrong or both are right or wrong, but if we can't move on then sometimes that has to happen. For example, you and Leo etc would not see an inference of design because of the 'patterns' stuff being discussed on other threads. You believe we have evolved the tendancy to see patterns etc and this has good reasons as well as 'incorrect' ones. At this moment in time, with my limited knowledge, I still see 'design' due to the complexity, initial origins of life, the moral code. You can explain these things via evolution and you may well be right, but I think 'God' is still a possibility, however small. Maybe I should say, we'll agree to disagree 'for now'.......and there is no need for anyone getting nasty......

Sorry, I'm no good at trying to edit just portions....