Well I gotta say Daystar, that you when you say you don't care about science I am a little surprised. I am simply not sure why you, who seem to be a critical thinker, would not be interested in at least the evolutionary biology part of science. This is especially true since you feel strongly about creation... why don't you care about at least bettering your understanding of the theory which you oppose?
The burden of proof he's talking about is the idea that one cannot rationally assume that god exists- innocent until proven guilty is the same idea. You don't assume what you are trying to prove, which is why there is always a burden of proof in trying to provide evidence for a hypothesis.
The burden of proof he's talking about is the idea that one cannot rationally assume that god exists- innocent until proven guilty is the same idea. You don't assume what you are trying to prove, which is why there is always a burden of proof in trying to provide evidence for a hypothesis.