RE: Miracles and Anti-supernaturalism
August 8, 2013 at 2:16 pm
(This post was last modified: August 8, 2013 at 2:17 pm by ronedee.)
(August 8, 2013 at 12:55 pm)Esquilax Wrote: And as I said, abandoning actual credible argument in favor of just reinterpreting the motivations of those opposing you is egotistical, childish, and ineffective in the extreme. Now quit having your tantrum and come back with something real.
"Tantrum"? You resemble your own statement^
I told you this wasn't a competition. It was a "miracle". You (and others) have taken it upon yourself to try and discredit me, as a person....because of my lack of stats? Not to mention 10 of you coming from every direction...and each treating me like I have your undivided attention!
I didn't research anything but was in "THAT ARTICLE". You know, the one you, and the others didn't read. But I'm supposed to READ EVERYTHING!
It's pretty obvious what this is all about....
If it's personal persecution lets go in that direction from this point forward. I can fight when I'm being assaulted.. If its an exchange of ideas, concepts and experiences lets do that instead.
But, I won't do both (like you have handily done). I haven't tried to discredit, abuse or assualt anyone here with my pov. I just express it. I don't resort to name calling and swearing, and ridicule...it's not what I want to do.
If I sound "condescending" as I've been wrongly accused of, its because of my enthusiasm. Not because I hate you! Or think I know it all.
But, lets compare that to all the cussing at me...for stating my opinion?
Why?
If [any] of you can't express themseleves w/o shit, then why expect any explanations of anything I put forth? Why not expect the same bullshit back?
I think the scriptural people here are alot better off than myself! I chose to approach atheists from a "common sense" pov. But, everyone here (atheists) fancy themseleves "intellectuals".
And as a common sense person... I've had many experiences with intellectuals who can write 10 page math formulars, but can't change a light bulb. So, the divide is deep.
And now I see there is no common ground from that method.
Quis ut Deus?