(August 9, 2013 at 4:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You're making the same point as me Locke, you just didn't work that out yet.
Are you condemning the 'religious' part of faith? Because I'm with you there. Buit what has that to do with what I'm saying, other than show your lack of understanding of what we're talking about?
You seem to have a problem with your own concept of knowledge, which I see you struggling to align with what is commonly accepted. I think that's where your confusion arises.
I went back and read your post again.. I think I was reading it differently than you intended.
I still don't know where you got that nature is God.. but I thought you were also arguing that anyone who tests their faith against evidence is therefore showing that their faith must be put to the test, and in so doing is proving that it isn't faith in God, but faith in knowledge instead, and therefore has left a solid foundation.
So basically I thought you were condemning anything but blind, untested faith.
![[Image: AJqsKtG.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FAJqsKtG.jpg)