RE: No verifiable evidence is the Christian position
August 12, 2013 at 8:45 am
(This post was last modified: August 12, 2013 at 8:46 am by fr0d0.)
Because it's logically valid Esq. Logically valid yet possible to translate another way. I don't see how the alternate translation/s lead to an equally satisfying answer, but that's for you to support, if you oppose it.
Esq spotted it Chas. "verifiable"
Esq spotted it Chas. "verifiable"