(August 12, 2013 at 10:26 am)popeyespappy Wrote: Lots of problems with the analysis of the draft report done by The Economist. See the link for where they got it wrong.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/economis...ivity.html
Even if The Economist amends/recalls it's report, the original will be sourced as scientific evidence that global warming 'taint all that bad'. The damage is done. I'd say the writers knew exactly what outcome they hoped to achieve presenting it.
Schmucks.