RE: No verifiable evidence is the Christian position
August 12, 2013 at 1:37 pm
(This post was last modified: August 12, 2013 at 1:52 pm by fr0d0.)
Non verifiable evidence is the obvious answer I'd go for faith. 
Esq
It is the true answer if it's the only logical one.
How many scientists replicating an answer does it take to declare a theory? Two?
How many religious people replicating an answer does it take to declare a theory? There cannot be enough apparently.
I produce the bible as evidence. So according to you, "I have reason to be convinced"
Circular reasoning, yes. You demand that unlike in the real world, you must have physical evidence of something that isn't physical. Do you see the circle? In denying the truth, you are able to support your assertion that this particular non physical thing cannot be logical.
You insist that we must have evidence of this thing that cannot, by its nature, be evidenced. Again, circular reasoning.
Wake up and smell the mustard Esq. It smells of shit, because you're full of it.
Esq
It is the true answer if it's the only logical one.
How many scientists replicating an answer does it take to declare a theory? Two?
How many religious people replicating an answer does it take to declare a theory? There cannot be enough apparently.
I produce the bible as evidence. So according to you, "I have reason to be convinced"
Circular reasoning, yes. You demand that unlike in the real world, you must have physical evidence of something that isn't physical. Do you see the circle? In denying the truth, you are able to support your assertion that this particular non physical thing cannot be logical.
You insist that we must have evidence of this thing that cannot, by its nature, be evidenced. Again, circular reasoning.
Wake up and smell the mustard Esq. It smells of shit, because you're full of it.
