(August 14, 2013 at 10:17 am)FallentoReason Wrote: I'm not quite following you... all I basically said was that you've stated that miracles are objectively a natural thing. Therefore, it doesn't matter what my "explanation as a non-believer" might be, because whatever the *true* explanation is will be reducible to natural processes, according to you. This means that asking how exactly water gets turned to wine and why humanity hasn't stumbled onto such a process a rather fitting couple of questions relative to your stance on miracles.
I'm saying miracles have to be ambiguous or they would disprove God.
The only real thing is faith, and the rational position. See Jesus affirming this all of the time. If you believe because you see it, then your faith is pretty worthless, and your potential to act because you understand why you believe is severely limited.
