RE: No verifiable evidence is the Christian position
August 17, 2013 at 4:33 am
(This post was last modified: August 17, 2013 at 4:35 am by fr0d0.)
FTR
The only way I contradict myself is if you have a problem with comprehension. I've repeated again and again, and it says in the thread title my position. Somehow, incredibly, you don't get this. I surmise that you're trolling here.
What haven't I responded to?
What has the OP got to do with belief in God? Let me educate you: the subject is that no verifiable proof is the Christian position. You state that "supernatural agents don't act" from your position of disbelief. How can you say this? Answer: because there can be no verifiable proof. You are supporting the Christian position that there can't be verifiable proof. Do I need a sledge hammer to drive this point home?
As for you empathy, you just don't get that as Christians, we accept supernatural explanation over natural ones. BECAUSE There is meaning to the supernatural event. The event proves God/ is evidence of God interacting in the world.
We don't think that Jesus was deceiving anyone, Mr empathy, we believe he actually performed miracles/ that these were supernatural acts. We also KNOW that every one of these acts could be interpreted as having natural cause TO AN UNBELIEVER, because that's the way it has to be, if there couldn't be verifiable proof of the supernatural/ if Christian faith made sense.
The only way I contradict myself is if you have a problem with comprehension. I've repeated again and again, and it says in the thread title my position. Somehow, incredibly, you don't get this. I surmise that you're trolling here.
What haven't I responded to?
What has the OP got to do with belief in God? Let me educate you: the subject is that no verifiable proof is the Christian position. You state that "supernatural agents don't act" from your position of disbelief. How can you say this? Answer: because there can be no verifiable proof. You are supporting the Christian position that there can't be verifiable proof. Do I need a sledge hammer to drive this point home?
As for you empathy, you just don't get that as Christians, we accept supernatural explanation over natural ones. BECAUSE There is meaning to the supernatural event. The event proves God/ is evidence of God interacting in the world.
We don't think that Jesus was deceiving anyone, Mr empathy, we believe he actually performed miracles/ that these were supernatural acts. We also KNOW that every one of these acts could be interpreted as having natural cause TO AN UNBELIEVER, because that's the way it has to be, if there couldn't be verifiable proof of the supernatural/ if Christian faith made sense.
