RE: christian "love"
August 21, 2013 at 2:25 pm
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2013 at 2:28 pm by Drich.)
(August 21, 2013 at 1:25 pm)genkaus Wrote:Again, no.(August 21, 2013 at 10:03 am)Drich Wrote: Just as the lost son did. He said 'he had no father.' You say you have no "Father." There is no difference in your final conclusion.
Whether you take the interstate to your favorite spot on the beach or the back roads your final destination is still your favorite spot on the beach. if you believe your lie (that you have no Father) you can never go back. If you accept your statement for what it is, then if you ever want to go back the possibility still remains.
Thanks for clearing up my confusion. So you are not being insincere and condescending. You really are that stupid.
The big difference between my conclusion and the son's is that he did not say that the father does not exist. All evidence suggests that while the son knows that his father is real, that he exists and he is simply choosing to refuse to let him play any role in his life. When I say "there is no father" I'm literally implying non-existence.
I'd say that your assumption here - that the statement "there is no father" is a lie I'm telling myself - is disgustingly condescending. But I understand now that you don't mean to be condescending, you are just too stupid to get that fact.
Both you ( the one who says there is no God) and the son who says my 'father/God' is dead, have arrived at the same point or destination(your favorite spot on the beach) now the son who says the father is dead took the Interstate. And you who says there is no God took the back roads. Either way you want to look at it you both wound up in the same place. (Your favorite spot on the beach) meaning to both of you there is no God. You want to look at the sons journey and tell me your in a different place than he is, but your in the same place. So again it does not matter how you got to the beach, the fact of the matter is that you are there.
(August 21, 2013 at 11:05 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:(August 21, 2013 at 10:03 am)Drich Wrote: Yes the lack of book chapter and verse/context, in your appraisal.
Just mistakenly gave you credit for knowing your Bible well enough to recognize the references. Even so, I'd think you could look them up yourself. Are you claiming not all of those verses are in the Bible?
The problem of course, is the verse claiming God is love. That's a ridiculous notion at odds with the whole concept of God as a personal being, and there's no context that could justify it, it's fluff, and misleading fluff at that.
Now that you have established my ignorance, then please proceed to show me where in the bible (BCV) God is as you have stated.