RE: What if Jesus had failed?
August 24, 2013 at 5:06 pm
(This post was last modified: August 24, 2013 at 5:07 pm by MindForgedManacle.)
(August 24, 2013 at 9:49 am)Sword of Christ Wrote: I think you'll find it's the same thing, though perhaps atheism is slightly more than skepticism.
And you're completely wrong. They are not the same. I've known skeptics who weren't atheists, and atheists who weren't skeptics. They're not anything like interchangeable.
Quote:
Like I said 95% are naturally explainable and 5% are likely to be unmanned probes. They could be something else but that explanation would seem like the most reasonable. Bear in mind these objects are tracked on radar and are seen by reputable sources. We're talking professional trained pilots and even the crew of the Apollo first mission to land on the moon these guys aren't crackpots or something. It seems likely these things have been appearing for thousands of years ass reports of them go way way back.
Okay, defend your claim. Assuming that 95% are in fact explainable, what does that allow you to conclude about the other 5%, hm? NOTHING... well, accept one thing: they currently aren't explicable, either due to our current limitations or due to lack of data. The skeptic wins this bout hands down, because by necessity even if there are existent unmanned ET probes, the likelihood that any UFO sighting is of one of them is hilariously low.