(August 27, 2013 at 9:17 am)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: Whoever claims to have created reality needs to be able to face up to reality. The bible needs to be compared to reality and hold its own. It obviously fails to do so. This is inexcusable for a supposed creator.reality is only based on your ablity to perceive and understand what is happening around you. Reality simply is, however our understanding of it changes from generation to generation. If you can not understand what God has done, it's not God's fault. The burden is on you to seek understanding beyond what you are currently comfortable with.
Quote:Of course you'd encourage people to look at the bible alone.When have I done this? or are you simply ignoring the majority of my post so you can play to a steriotype you are comfortable with? Because in your 'reality' this is what ALL Christian's do.
See if your ablity to reason is tied to your biased understanding of 'reality' (As just outlined above) then how is it God's doing that you have a hard time perceiving what is 'real' and what is not?
Quote:Look at what god claims to do rather than the reality god claims to be responsible for. From reality I tend to think that god is quite the monster.But, we have already shown 'your reality' takes truth and twists it to coinside with your 'feelings' on a subject matter. That makes Your reality not objective nor dependable. so how can we then say your personal judgement of God is just or dependable?
Quote:But even if you disagree with my assessment, you did claim that god will be willing to give people deadly diseases just to prove a point.where exactly?
Quote:I'm afraid that's too immoral and distasteful for us, as I doubt many on this forum would willingly infect someone with AIDS just to prove a point.
Have we not been over the defination of 'morality' yet?Quote:I don't think many will want to be friends with your god let alone worship him.on this I agree.
