Not again! -- Encouragement Please

[Esquilax]

But this has to be the case, for anyone who subscribes to a belief that there are objective truths. Anyone who purports to be an exception to an absolute truth/law/etc cannot possibly be an exception if it runs contrary to what must be true. If god is the only way to the actual-100%-for-sure-truth, to deny him is to either be wrong or to deliberately deny what cannot be denied. I don't think that there is room for compromise.

Yeah, I sort of just wanted to know where Drich was pinning his label of objectivity; if it's straight up on god then there's simply no point in talking further because he's got a presupposition that disarms rational conversation. Not only that, but he'd be plain wrong; unless he can demonstrate his god beyond his usual A/S/K nonsense, then he's talking about an inherently subjective experience.

I felt there was some wriggle room that made the question worth asking, at any rate.