The nature of God

[fr0d0]

I find talking with you to be a bit of an effort fr0d0.

I find little reason to talk with you. I answered your question... what more do you want??

I find talking with you to be a bit of an effort fr0d0.

Most of us do.

And that's the most coherent thing you're likely to respond with.

Sorry Frodo, You can't use a traditional view of God. That is the point of the thread. To step outside of that box. But, we have concluded that God is not an emergent property. But a Creator. But since the universe is approx. 14 billion years old, it's objectives are not just that of the human race worshipping it. So what would it's ultimate goals be?

Others were talking of the Christian God Zen and I was merely answering them.

'We have concluded' LOL
...'Someone' has suggested God is a creator yet not emergent without any logical trace. How do you make such a leap?

'It's' ultimate goal is clearly nothing to do with human adoration. Another wild leap of logic.

...seems to me you're simply butchering a concept you have very little knowledge of rather than making any progress towards formulating a realistic theology.


Omnipresence is a universal 'god' attribute which VOID ignorantly rubbishes. Pippy made a perfectly rational point which was irrationally dismissed. God is indeed seen as 'everything'.