The problem with find "contradictions" in the texts is the difference in writing styles of the authors. All four authors had distinct penmanship that influenced what events are recorded. With that said, how can we understand the bias of each of the authors? For example, the apperent bias towards the "villan" Judas Iscariot, the only disicple with his full named mentioned. I merely stating this that skepticism is needed when reading these gospels. I have my fathers entire theology library and can reference alot of archeology and history, and I can tell you that the harmony of the gospels are not as apperent. Due to catholic rule and influence, we lost alot of history to what really happened when the sect of judaism started to grow upon the death Jesus of Nazareth.
![[Image: grumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-_GaCN-f8ZFo%2FUNfmimTyf4I%2FAAAAAAAANmk%2FoakT_wL319U%2Fs1600%2Fgrumpy-cat-and-jesus-meme-died-for-sins.jpg)
I would be a televangelist....but I have too much of a soul.