Something about that christian defender really pisses me off. I think I know what it is.
That guy is responding as if he is defending a comic book superhero or villain or whatever like people would say about Thanos on Comic Vine.
I have no problem with people defending their comic book characters from anything because We all know that these characters are purposely fictional and for our entertainment.
But this christian is treating his character named "god" as if it were real. This is a fallacy I would like to call the nonfictional breach fallacy.
That guy is responding as if he is defending a comic book superhero or villain or whatever like people would say about Thanos on Comic Vine.
I have no problem with people defending their comic book characters from anything because We all know that these characters are purposely fictional and for our entertainment.
But this christian is treating his character named "god" as if it were real. This is a fallacy I would like to call the nonfictional breach fallacy.
