RE: The nature of God
January 16, 2010 at 3:12 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2010 at 3:13 pm by fr0d0.)
The extra's I appreciate are exclusive to my faith, being from that relationship. It's not all the time. I'll try to think of a specific example for you.
I didn't say that I 'achieved' a healthy perspective', but have that aim. Just like you, I'm affected by my own rationalising of any given situation. What you're doing, and what anyone would, is reasoning your way to as healthy an outlook as possible. We just use different methods. The difference is though, I don't mock and condemn you for your methodology.
It is anti Christian to not challenge belief. It is an essential requisite that many people fail to recognise. Just yesterday a friend was telling me how in school RE class the prissy teacher told her she mustn't question... which of course lost her the respect of the class. You can't champion error for me to defend I'm afraid.
I didn't say that I 'achieved' a healthy perspective', but have that aim. Just like you, I'm affected by my own rationalising of any given situation. What you're doing, and what anyone would, is reasoning your way to as healthy an outlook as possible. We just use different methods. The difference is though, I don't mock and condemn you for your methodology.
It is anti Christian to not challenge belief. It is an essential requisite that many people fail to recognise. Just yesterday a friend was telling me how in school RE class the prissy teacher told her she mustn't question... which of course lost her the respect of the class. You can't champion error for me to defend I'm afraid.