(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: "Why do you consider social engineering a bad thing?"
The last lot of 'socio-engineering gave us the Nazi regieme (I could be wrong here) And the Germanic peoples felt (initially) that it was a good thing
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: If it is making (engineering) constructs for people to live in (social), then I have no issue.
I disagree Pip, and put forward the soci-engineering of the scisms within the major religious social constructs
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: I was just trying to point out the sustainability can be a dangerous word. Some people are moving towards a more sustainable future that includes killing 95% of the population, and those 'social engineers' are very much not in the right.
I have issue with this as well. We are told to 'Save the Planet' by reducing Greenhouse emissions back to pre-industrial days. But to do that would involve the destruction of a world ecconomy, advances in science, and the population percentage you have quoted.
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: So the new party may be in line with other sustainability initiatives that border on eugenics.
I thought that was what Religion has been trying to do these past 10,000 years
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: Like this creepy Agenda 21 thing. Or Pax Alimentarius.
Don't know enough about it but ....yes on the surface it does look creepy...(aka dogey deals)
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: Just a point. I only have a problem with the social engineers that are on the side of evil. Or is it evil people pretending to be social engineers?
Then that includes everyone pip. Every man out for him / her self and personal agenda.
For my money there is no such thing as evil or sin or good or bad or any of those value judgement labels....just cause and consequence.
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5