(September 19, 2013 at 10:24 am)Ryantology Wrote: But, it is God himself who perceives these behaviors as flaws. The special pleading fallacy is your only defense.It's not special pleading to apply concepts differently to different objects. It wouldn't be special pleading, for instance, to tell a 5-year-old that he shouldn't drink beer while I have a beer in my hand, because adults can presumably handle the effects of beer better than 5-year-olds.
Quote:I can only assume that this is an admission that objective morality is logically impossible.Whiskey tango... do any of you people pay attention to what I write? It seems that you're just arguing against the stereotype in your head. I have said repeatedly on this forum that no, I do not believe that there is such a thing as objective morality. It's no "admission," it's been my position all along.