RE: Damn it! Who told them?!
January 18, 2010 at 3:15 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2010 at 3:20 am by KichigaiNeko.)
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: "Why do you consider social engineering a bad thing?"
Because the last major exersise in social engineering gave us Hitler's Nazi Party
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: If it is making (engineering) constructs for people to live in (social), then I have no issue.
I do, it comes close to me telling you that you can NOT have the views that you do on point of death, or some such nonsense
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: I was just trying to point out the sustainability can be a dangerous word.
The word "Sustainability" is the least of our worries
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: Some people are moving towards a more sustainable future that includes killing 95% of the population, and those 'social engineers' are very much not in the right.
And the general population is hot for it as well. And yes if you want to stop global warming and get back to pre-industrial CO2 that would be the case, a decrease in population numbers.
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: So the new party may be in line with other sustainability initiatives that border on eugenics.
No, they are just a bunch of crackpots from Tasmania who romaticise about the good old days.
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: Like this creepy Agenda 21 thing. Or Pax Alimentarius.
Have dowloaded the material on this (haven't heard of it before) ....seems Aus govt is quite committed to this.
(January 18, 2010 at 1:51 am)Pippy Wrote: Just a point. I only have a problem with the social engineers that are on the side of evil. Or is it evil people pretending to be social engineers?
There is no such thing as evil. Only choice and consequence
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
