There's always at least one unknown unknown: the status of the set of unknown unknowns (i.e you can't even know if the set is empty or not).
It can only be said that you cannot rule out any more due to that single unknown unknown. That alone would seem to invalidate omniscience as a possible attribute I think. Or am I indeed begging the question?
It can only be said that you cannot rule out any more due to that single unknown unknown. That alone would seem to invalidate omniscience as a possible attribute I think. Or am I indeed begging the question?
