(September 29, 2013 at 4:51 pm)Maelstrom Wrote:(September 29, 2013 at 4:45 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: Do you have any evidence to support your claim that "If there is no evidence to support the existence of something, the logical step would be to adhere to the atheistic position in regards to its existence."?
Yes, it is called reality and logic. Look into it some time.
I can see you really believe that.
But I don't think you see just how dubious a logical conclusion it really is.
I mean, unless you have redefined atheism to mean agnosticism, in which case it would make sense, as given the absence of evidence for something, it seems most prudent to be neutral to the question or whether or not it exists.
But being an atheist is certainly not the same as being neutral.
