(September 20, 2013 at 4:33 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote:
The Argument Wrote:P1) Omniscience is the ability for a mind to possess all knowledge.
P2) You cannot be aware of that which you are [currently] unaware of, even if in principle you could one day become aware of it.
P3) If you are unaware of something, you cannot have knowledge of it so long as you remain unaware of it.
P4) Because P1-3 are true, knowledge of the status of the set referring to "everything one's mind is unaware of" is unknowable, even if the set itself has no members.
C1) Therefore omniscience is an impossible attribute to possess.
P5) God is defined as a being whom possesses the attribute of omniscience.
C2) Therefore God does not exist.
Is there anything wrong here?
The logic is sound; however, P2 is fucked on arrival by commonly held definitions of God.
