RE: standard of evidence
October 2, 2013 at 9:41 am
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2013 at 9:42 am by LastPoet.)
(October 2, 2013 at 9:13 am)Rational AKD Wrote: the extraordinary claims objection is not a rational objection by any means due to the fact that it's completely subjective.Why?
Quote:how do you objectively determine whether something is an extraordinary claim? you can't any more than you can claim pizza is the best tasting food. different people have different opinions on what is extraordinary. to a prince in a tropical climate who has never seen ice before, the very description of ice would to him seem extraordinary. does this mean he is justified not believing there is ice? of course not.
the extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence claim is nothing more than a catchy phrase with no practical value.
Your analogy is completely off what I tried to convey. Nice attempt to dodge, but a god is an extraordinary thing, is it not?