(October 2, 2013 at 9:13 am)Rational AKD Wrote: to a prince in a tropical climate who has never seen ice before, the very description of ice would to him seem extraordinary. does this mean he is justified not believing there is ice? of course not.
the extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence claim is nothing more than a catchy phrase with no practical value.
The major difference is that it would be possible to show him some ice, since we all know that ice exists. For some reason it seems impossible for Christians to show nonbelievers their god. If someone was skeptical of ice existing, it would be possible to procure some just to show him. However, when it comes to gods, instead of procuring this god in reality special magical properties are always invoked to explain why nobody can see, feel, taste, smell, or detect the existence of this god in any way.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.