standard of evidence

[Rational AKD]

Another dodge. You still miss the point. Don't do hiding in semantics, it is you presenting the evidence, how can we test such evidence value? By mentally masturbating a god that somehow feels like you feel? Thanks, but no thanks.

you commit an equivocation fallacy and try to ask a loaded question and yet accuse me of dodging it for pointing these facts out? well, isn't this fun...
look, I understand it is my responsibility to bring evidence to substantiate my claim, but it is also your responsibility as the proponent to specify what qualifies as adequate evidence and an adequate amount of evidence. but it seems instead of answering, you try and justify having a ridiculous burden of proof on the theists with the extraordinary evidence claim even though that claim itself is subjective and of no logical value.