(October 2, 2013 at 5:05 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Point being you are shifting the burden of proof. You can make whatever naked assertion you want, but I am not going to swallow it simply because you can string words together.
why don't you argue with what I say rather than making it up committing straw man fallacy. I never said once believe in God because there's no evidence to the contrary. I said if you believe there is no God, you must have evidence to substantiate it. saying "there's no evidence for God, so there is no God" is not adequate.
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.
-Galileo
-Galileo
